Mary LeighThe
Wardresses forced me on to the
bed and the two doctors came in with them, and while I was held down a
nasal tube was inserted. It
is two yards long with a funnel at the end - there is a glass junction
in the middle to see if the liquid is passing.
The end is put up the nostril, one one day, and the other
nostril, the other. Great
pain is experienced during the process ... the drums of the ear seem to
be bursting, a horrible pain in the throat and the breast.
The tube is pushed down 20 inches.
I have to lie on the bed, pinned down by Wardresses, one doctor
stands up on a chair holding the funnel at arms length, so as to have
the funnel end above the level, and then the other doctor, who is
behind, forces the other end up the nostrils. The
one holding the funnel end pours the liquid down; about a pint of milk,
sometimes egg and milk are used....
Before and after use, they test my heart and make a lot of
examination. The
after-effects are a feeling of faintness, a sense of great pain in the
chest, in the nose and the ears.... I
was very sick on the first occasion after the tube was withdrawn. Mary Leigh, describing being force-fed in September 1912. Mary Leigh was a Suffragette who was the first women to break a window, and later was committed to five years in jail for an arson attack on Dublin Theatre. In 1919 she had climbed onto the roof of a building and thrown slates at policemen. She wrote her account while she was still in prison.
|
|
Rose HoweyThe
Prison Commissioners, Gentlemen, I
have the honour to report that today I saw and examined Rose E.N. Howey
at H.M. Prison, Walton, in consultation with Dr Price. I
also took part in the artificial feeding by tube. Rose
E.N. Howey is about 25 years of age, a spare, fair complexioned woman but highly
neurotic. She was
sentenced on January 15th to six weeks imprisonment. From
the records I find that on committal she weighed 114 lbs, and today she
weighs 108lb. Her
height is 5ft 5in. Her
lungs and heart are quite healthy; respiration quiet; pulse 72
regular, blood circulation active. Tongue clean, teeth good, no
swelling of stomach; bowels regular; menstrual periods regular; knee
jerks excessive. Her
throat is rather small and slightly granular but not inflamed. She
evidently had in childhood post-natal adenoids, but her nostrils are now
quite free. On
passing the tube there was slight spasm at the upper end of the throat 5
to 6 inches from the teeth; this no doubt increases the discomfort of
the passage of the tube, but it can be easily got over by using a fine
moderately stiff tube. Personally
I would be inclined to leave her without food for two or three days and
by that time the spasm will have passed off. Any
ordinary individual can survive with only water for a couple of weeks,
and there is no damage to life in a healthy individual from any loss of
body weight up to 25 per cent, or say 20 per cent, including the weight
of the clothing. This
woman can therefore afford to lose 23 lb without any risk. James
Barr, a doctor, writing to the Prison Commissioners in 1910 This account is important, because it gives the lie to the claim that the doctors were force-feeding the women to save their lives - here, the doctor is making it clear that the women was far from death when she was force-fed.
|
|
Constance Lytton[The doctor] put down my throat a tube which seemed to me much too wide and was something like four feet in length. The irritation of the tube was excessive. I choked the moment it touched my throat until it had got down. Then the food was poured in quickly; it made me sick a few seconds after it was down and the action of the sickness made my body and legs double up, but the wardresses instantly pressed back my head and the doctor leant on my knees.
The
horror of it was more than I can describe. I was sick over
the doctor and wardresses, and it seemed a long time before they took
the tube out. As the doctor left me he gave me a slap on the
cheek, not violently, but as it were, to express his contemptuous
disapproval. Lady Constance Lytton, describing her own force-feeding in 1910 Wealthy and titled Suffragettes received preferential treatment in prison, so Lady Constance Lytton pretended to be a poor woman named 'Jane Wharton' and, once in prison, went on hunger strike. Lady Lytton had a heart problem and poor health, but she was not medically examined before she was force-fed. The deception was soon discovered and she was released, but she never fully recovered and suffered a stroke in 1912.
|
|